Saul, David and Solomon
The parable of three kings
By Hugo L j. Odhner
1. The
Reluctant Kingmaker
In the sacred history
which is comprised in the Old Testament certain periods are given
special emphasis. The four generations of Hebrew patriarchs - Abram,
Isaac, Jacob and Joseph - occupy most of the book of Genesis. The
story of Moses and the exodus from Egypt, followed by the conquest of
Canaan, is the subject of four other books. The brief period of United
Israel under the three notable kings, Saul, David, and Solomon, is the
next detailed account. The story of the two prophets Elijah and Elisha
covers a great many chapters in the two books of Kings. And finally
the books of Jeremiah, Daniel, and other prophets give many incidents
from the time of the Babylonish captivity.
The inspired Writings of
Emanuel Swedenborg give a detailed exposition of only two of the books
of the Old Testament - namely, Genesis and Exodus, the spiritual sense
of which is fully unfolded in the Arcana Coelestia. Besides this, they
give meager outlines of the spiritual sense of the Prophets and the
Psalms. Yet there are sufficient teachings given, scattered in these
Writings, to enable us to confirm that all the events of the Biblical
drama internally treat of the progressive states of the Lord's
glorification and of man's regeneration; indeed, that the Old
Testament contains a continuous internal sense which reflects and
contains the spiritual teachings of the Lord in His second advent.
It is predicted of the
New Church that "every Divine truth in the sense of the letter of the
Word is, with the men of that church, translucent from the Divine
truth in the spiritual sense." This is signified when it is said that
the walls of the New Jerusalem were of jasper, shining like crystal.
"The Word in the sense of the letter is of such a nature that the more
a man is enlightened by the influx of the light of heaven, so much the
more does he see truths in their connection and thence in their form;
and the more he so sees them, so much the more is his rational mind
opened interiorly, for the rational is the very receptacle of the
light of heaven." (AR 911, cf 897).
The present little
volume aims to present some highlights in the story of the three kings
of United Israel; for in a sense their reign marks the culmination of
Israel's hopes and the nearest fulfilment of Jehovah's promise of a
homeland for Abraham's seed. It is a very human story, this striving
of the twelve tribes for a country of their own; a story which reminds
us of the pioneering efforts of many immigrant peoples who have fled
from oppression. And in a larger aspect, does not every man long for
the freedom, peace, and power of an inheritance of his own - for a
field of uses of his own or for the fulfilment of the promise implied
in his inherited talents? The spiritually minded man sees this
promised land more clearly, as an opening of new opportunities for
selfless cooperation with others in uses which look to the
establishment of the kingdom of God, both on earth and eternally in
heaven - uses which promote charity and spiritual enlightenment and
are inspired by, and centered in, an ever more pure and perfect
worship of the Lord and in a realization of His leading.
All such human
aspirations - civil, moral, and spiritual - find their parallel in the
events which led up to the establishment of Israel in its promised
land. Whatever men find to be worth striving for as a means to a life
more abundant, can be reached only by the way which Israel had to
tread.
Progress begins with a
vision of this goal. There must be a Moses to reveal it and hold it
before our eyes. But there must also be a realization of the bonds
that bind us, and the courage to shake them off. We must leave the
merely worldly climate of Egypt. We must commit ourselves to the
hardships of the wilderness - to a sacrifice of less important things,
to the discipline and training which the Lord called "the strait gate"
and "the narrow way." We must accept new laws and order our lives for
survival, and fight for each new stage of the way.
The fight seems often as
one against outward conditions, external enemies. But on closer
examination it is realized to be a fight against ourselves, a struggle
for self-control, for mastery over the impulses of one's lower self; a
fight against our inward foes.
This held true even with
the Israelites, who could not advance into their inheritance until,
after forty years, a new generation, trained in warfare, had been
raised up. The conquest of Canaan under Joshua was never a complete
conquest, however. The tribes settled down in their scattered
districts, but usually they could only maintain themselves in the
mountains and highlands, while their enemies held - or by turns
controlled - most of the fertile valleys and the shores of the western
sea. The only strength of Israel lay in their possession of a common
shrine - the tabernacle at Shiloh in the center of the land. For there
the scattered tribes gathered to consult together and learn the will
of God. When, through disloyalty, they had fallen into idolatry
and intermarriage with their pagan neighbors, their strength departed.
Foreign nations or nearby nomadic tribes then invaded and began to
oppress them. But in such times of crisis, common leaders were raised
up by the Lord, to lead the repentant people to throw off their alien
yoke.
In this period of
perhaps several centuries, known as the period of the Judges, the
solidarity of Israel was maintained against terrific odds. While the
worship of Jehovah was continued at Shiloh, there was no central
government and the Mosaic laws were largely neglected and forgotten.
And the sacred chronicle repeatedly complains that "in those days
there was no king in Israel but every one did what was right in his
own eyes." It was an era of political and moral confusion. We see this
in the pathetic story of Jephthah, who sacrificed his own daughter in
fulfilment of a rash promise to Jehovah. We see it in the strange
story of Samson, who used his God-given strength with playful abandon,
but whose moral weaknesses blinded him to deceptions. We see it in the
tale of Micah whose idols were stolen by the Danites. We see it,
intensified, in the terrible moral degradation which caused Israel in
horror almost to annihilate the tribe of Benjamin.
* * *
One of the last of the
Judges was Eli, a good but weak man, who also was priest at Shiloh.
But his two sons, who were in charge of the sacrifices, were evil and
utterly corrupt; and the Lord sent a man of God charging the father
with honoring his sons above the Lord, when he only mildly rebuked
them for their abuses. The Lord therefore raised up Samuel to succeed
him.
Samuel was one of the
most admirable characters in the Old Testament. His mother Hannah had
"lent him to the Lord" while yet a child. He is the first Scriptural
character who was the product of a religious education. He was brought
to Eli as soon as he was weaned, and was trained to help Eli in the
tabernacle. It is said that "the Word of the Lord was precious" - that
is, rare or unusual - "in those days; there was no open vision." Yet
while he still was a child, Samuel was called to be a prophet of the
Lord, or a "seer", and it is plain also that he became one of the
inspired writers of Scripture. (I Sam. 10:25)
It is of interest to
note that during the period of the Judges the Lord sometimes sent His
"messenger" - or an angel - to exhort the people to repentance or to
strengthen some leader. Mention is also made of "a man of God"
rebuking them for their sins and thus acting as a prophet. Yet it
remained for Samuel to establish the prophetic office on a more stable
basis. He instituted the first prophetic school, a training-place for
a company which became known as "the sons of the prophets."
The "sons of the
prophets" were specifically trained in religious songs and the use of
psalteries, pipes, and harps, tabrets and cymbals. Some may have been
given instruction in the law and in writing. But besides this, they
seemed to have been seized at times with religious enthusiasm, dancing
and casting themselves in the dust, interpreting the message of God in
dramatic form, acting as if obsessed with the Divine Spirit even as to
their body. Several instances are shown of the hypnotic effect of such
choral actions upon the beholders who thus also were seized with the
prophetic impulse, and caught up in the vortex of inspiration.
In the last days of Eli
the priest, an event occurred which shook the foundation of Israel.
The two evil sons of the aged priest allowed the ark of the covenant
to be brought out from Shiloh into the field where Israel was battling
with the Philistines. It was an act of superstitious faith - whereby
the people's lack of courage and discipline was to be made up for by a
scheme to compel the Lord to work a miracle. The outcome was that the
sacred ark fell into the hands of the Philistines and the sons of Eli
were among those killed in the battle. And hearing of the disaster,
Eli's heart was broken, and he fell dead from his seat.
Here came Samuel's
opportunity to rally the people from their crushing defeat, rebuild
their faith by a call to prayer and repentance. The Philistines were
eventually pressed back, with the Lord's help, so that, for twenty
years, they "came no more into the coasts of Israel." "And Samuel
judged Israel all the days of his life." The Philistines voluntarily
returned the sacred ark, which had brought them only misfortunes; and
it was lodged for twenty years in a small town in the Judean
foothills, within territory recovered from the Philistines. But it
does not appear that Kirjath-jearim, the place of the ark in this
period, was the only place of sacrifice, as Shiloh had been. For
Samuel went yearly on circuits to Beth-el* and Gilgal and Mizpeh, and
returning to his house at Ramah, sacrificing and performing his office
as a judge.
He also appointed other
judges, among them his two sons whom he set over Beer-sheba. But his
sons - to his sorrow - did not walk in his ways, but took bribes and
perverted judgment. Fearing that Samuel's sons would succeed him, the
people therefore came to Samuel and pleaded that he should appoint a
king over Israel, a king such as other nations had, a king to rule by
decree and lead them in battle.
This was a revolutionary
request! So far Israel had been a theocracy - its leaders had risen
spontaneously when a crisis made it necessary. No judge had ruled the
whole of Israel, each tribe had its own patriarchal government; and if
uncertainties arose the leaders could go to the high priest at Shiloh
and be guided by him when he consulted the Lord by means of the "urim
and thummim" on the sacred breastplate, or go to a seer or "man of
God." But after the death of Eli, the priesthood was in disrepute and
the ark was no longer in Shiloh. The sons of Samuel were not
acceptable leaders. And the Philistines were a constant menace.
Samuel was much
disturbed by this demand for a king. However, the Lord said to him
that the people were not really rejecting Samuel, but rejecting the
Lord's more direct government. He told Samuel to give in to their
request, but to tell them frankly what kind of a king they would have
to expect: a king who would compel their goodliest young men to run
before his chariots and serve as soldiers and as harvesters of his
fields and as workmen to produce his weapons; and who would draft
their daughters to be cooks and confectioners; a king who would
confiscate the best of their property and take their asses for his own
work and demand as taxes a tenth of their sheep and of the fruit of
their labors.
But the people still
insisted that they wanted a king, and be like all the nations.
* * *
Soon after this, some
asses, belonging to Kish, a prominent Benjamite, strayed away; and he
sent his son Saul to look for them. Saul and his servant went far and
wide, but saw no sign of the asses. Finally, as they were well nigh
exhausted, they thought to ask Samuel the seer, who was in a nearby
town getting ready for a sacrifice. And Samuel, to whom the Lord
revealed that this choice young man, taller than any in Israel, was to
be the future king, embarrassed Saul by placing him in the chief seat
at the feast. And the next day Samuel took him aside and anointed his
head with oil and revealed to him his royal destiny.
Saul was shown by
various signs that Samuel spoke the truth. Saul was a bashful man, far
from self-reliant. But it happened, as Samuel foretold, that he met a
company of prophets, and the Spirit of God descended on him also, and
"gave him another heart" so that he was "turned into another man." And
he prophesied among the prophets. And the on-lookers exclaimed, "What
has happened to the son of Kish? Is Saul also among the prophets?"
Presently Samuel called
the people together and cast a lot to determine who was to become
king. And the Lord's choice fell on Saul, who had modestly hidden
himself among the supplies. All hailed him, with the cry, "Let the
king live" - or, as we would say, "Long live the king!" Yet Samuel
impressed on the people that they had done a great wickedness in
asking for a king.
And Samuel had soon
reason to be discontented with the new king, who was apt to trespass
on Samuel's prerogatives and - in his anxiety for the Lord's
protection against the approaching Philistines - took upon himself to
sacrifice in Samuel's absence and, again, to disobey the command to
utterly destroy Agag, the king of the Amalekites, and annihilate both
people and cattle. When Saul spared Agag as a captive and let the
Israelites save the choice animals for a sacrificial feast, Samuel
rebuked Saul, saying, "Has the Lord as great delight in burnt
offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold,
to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of
rams."
Saul made excuses, but
Samuel declared that the Lord had rejected him. As the seer turned
away Saul laid hold of Samuel's cloak, which rent. And Samuel
exclaimed, "The Lord has rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this
day, and has given it to a neighbor of thine, one better than thou!"
* * *
One who reads this story
cannot help having a good deal of sympathy for Saul. For he was placed
over the kingdom under almost insurmountable difficulties. He became
king in name only, and only a small band of men "whose hearts God had
touched" followed him home to Gibeah, his home town. And there were
many who were privately contemptuous of the upstart king. But it was
not long before he proved his worth. When the Ammonites beleaguered an
outlying city, he commanded all Israel to come to the rescue on pain
of death. And the victory which followed established Saul's authority.
But soon the Philistines
again began to encroach. Saul then had only six hundred men. And
except for Saul and Jonathan his son, they had no regular weapons,
neither sword nor spear. For so primitive was their condition, that
there was no smith in all Israel, but the people were obliged to go
down to the Philistines in the valleys to sharpen their axes and farm
implements; and iron tools were still scarce in those days.
The Philistines had many
garrisons throughout the country. It was Jonathan who on his own
initiative challenged this situation, saying, "There is no restraint
to the Lord to save by many or by few." So he and his armorbearer
climbed up a steep cliff and challenged an amused garrison of
Philistines, who exclaimed, "Look, the Hebrews have come forth out of
their holes." Yet after Jonathan had slain twenty of the enemy the
whole garrison resorted to flight. And at this Saul's men took heart,
and many Hebrews who had served with the Philistines took Israel's
side, and soon the whole countryside was cleared of Philistines who
turned in rout towards their coastal cities.
Saul now consolidated
his gains, and with the help of his uncle Abner, who became the
captain of his host, he soon controlled the hinterland even down to
the southern deserts. But it was when he thus defeated the Amalekites
in the south that he was disowned by Samuel for disobedience. And
never again did Samuel see Saul.
* * *
It was said that every
man, in some fashion, seeks to inherit the land of promise which is
latent in the talents with which he is born. As he grows up, he is led
on by ideals of life which differ with his age. And since all children
- if they are to make something of themselves - must become civil and
moral, and acquire the virtues distinctive of their age, it is these
virtues which stand out as the leading factors in the formation of
their minds.
At first these ideals -
in childhood - are not unified or constant. Like the various judges of
Israel, they rise to meet some crisis and are then soon replaced by
other interests. Like the judges, such as Jephthah and Samson, they
are confused with false loyalties and led to many errors, many
childish tragedies. Scattered bits of instruction may lead to the
formation of a spurious conscience which mistakes some popular
persuasion for the voice of God. Progress towards any unity of mind,
any integrated character, is impossible unless there develops a
universal quality which can give a general guidance.
And in our story, this
quality is described in the character of Samuel. It is Obedience.
The name Samuel can be
translated "God hears," or "One who hearkens to God." In general it
means Obedience. And Samuel, from childhood, was lent to the Lord,
and, brought up in the service of the tabernacle, heard the voice of
God as a child. He put aside his own fears and preferences, to obey
the Lord. "Behold," he said, "to obey is better than sacrifice, and to
hearken than the fat of rams!" He had a quality of innocence and
forthrightness, a simple loyalty to the literal commands of God which
is reminiscent of the best qualities of childhood.
Yet the time comes when
such obedience is not enough to rule the devious ambitions which rise
in the growing mind, and to meet the states which rebel and the
worldly falsities which invade the understanding. This is particularly
true when the states of childish trust in prayer and worship are
apparently disappointed and the Ark of the Covenant is stolen away
from the inmost center of the mind. The reliance on childish love for
parents becomes weakened and the tender celestial remains of infancy
fail to move the mind as formerly. The child becomes disillusioned
about his childhood dreams and feels insecure when he realizes how he
has been moved by one passing ideal after another and found them all
full of error. The mind comes into a sophisticated state. It is tired
of “judges." It wants a king! a truth that is unassailable,
permanent; whose authority cannot be challenged; a ruling principle
that shall dissolve all disputes, discover all wrongs, reconcile all
contradictions, banish all doubts!
So it is with every
normal child. And in our spiritual life, in the process of spiritual
growth, it is the same. Our first enthusiasms that lead us to battle
with some of our evils and cause us to do good works with a pleasing
sense of merit but without much judgment, are soon found to savor of a
spurious conscience, and we find that we must revise our principles
from time to time. This again is like Israel's state in the days of
the Judges. It is followed by the discovery of evils which hide even
in the sanctuary of our faith - like the unfaithful sons of Eli who
gambled away the Ark of the Covenant. And it is then that the only
salvation lies in a new humility - a simple obedience like that of
Samuel, a new repentance which marks a new spiritual childhood where
innocence can be re-established.
The Writings would call
such a state as is signified by Samuel, a "celestial natural" state,
such as is present with children and the simple. Indeed, we may
discern in all the Hebrew heroes from the period of the Judges
representations of those states of religious immaturity which achieve
something of reformation but fall back into disorders and mental
confusion; states in which glimpses of truths about faith and charity
are seen in the borrowed light of tradition, but in which the
impatient passions of the natural man continue to break forth to
obliterate this temporary illustration.
Samuel stands for the
highest attainment of this loyalty to the traditions and doctrines of
the church; a simple obedience which begins to hear the voice of God
as a call to inner repentance. But simple obedience cannot forever
rule the states of doubt and fear which clamor for recognition in the
mind. Tradition is not enough. Truth must be invested with a greater
authority, as chosen and anointed of the Lord; as a king vested with
permanent powers and able to fight against assailing falsities.
Such authoritative truth
cannot come from tradition, but must be seen in the Word itself. And
the kings of Israel, beginning with Saul, represent such Divine truth
as this is seen operating in the mind of man. In the literal sense of
the Word, these kings are described as human personalities, wherein
good is as it were mingled with evil, strength offset by weakness,
wisdom accompanied by folly. In a proximate sense, each king
represented the Divine truth as seen in a fallible human state, not as
it is in itself. But in the more interior view of the angels, the
evils mentioned in the Word disappear, for the angels see only the
Divine purpose and the Divine law within the literal sense. Acts
which appear cruel and shocking - such as the massacre of enemy
populations and the polygamy practiced by Israel's kings - come to
represent, in the spiritual sense, the highest justice and the
greatest mercies, for they describe complete deliverance from the
hells and the Lord's love for the universal church.
And the rivalry of
Samuel and Saul similarly represents the fluctuations in man's concept
as to what kind of truth should rule him for the best progress in
spiritual life. Samuel, on the Lord's command, anointed Saul. True
tradition, a true doctrine of the church, points, from a sense of
duty, to the authority of the Word and helps to prepare the way for
men to turn to the Word. Yet the Lord - and Samuel - regarded the
demand for a king as a decline, as if it was a revolt against the
government of the Lord. For in a sense, the rule of the judges was in
form a superior kind of government - like that of the celestial
kingdom of heaven - a government by truth seen from good. Hence it is
said that one must enter into the kingdom of heaven as a child. The
child accepts truth from a love of parents and masters, from the
affections active at the time. But when innocence departs, the
emerging evils of the proprium must be restrained and its falsities
put away by sterner methods, by the facing of truth as such, seen in
its own light. (AC 8770). From the sphere of the celestial kingdom man
departs into the custody of the spiritual kingdom of heaven. And the
truth man first accepts is that of the natural sense of the Word;
which in general is described by Saul.
* Possibly Beth-el, "the
House of God", was a title then bestowed on Kirjath-jearim.
|